Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Top 50 SEO Myths Everyone Should Know About | Search Engine ...

We?re shifting into a world in which smartphones and tablets are beginning to rule the roost in terms of connectivity. More people are searching for information via mobile phones, tablets, and smartphones.

Mobile Web Browsing

Mobile Web browsing is on the rise. Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lady-madonna/752175103/

Yelp reported several months ago that about 40% of searches came from their mobile app. BGR chimed in to say that a little more than 10% of all web searches originate from mobile devices. We?re now past the stage of expecting that mobile devices will take over web searches ? the process is already underway.

What does this mean for website owners? Or for optimization experts?

The future is mobile and the future is happening right now.

Googlebot Mobile, Google?s Recommendations, and More

Ideas and opinions about mobile SEO were floating around long before Google?s formal recommendations for mobile websites got posted. Following the introduction of Googlebot Mobile for smartphones and feature phones, webmasters and SEO specialists became involved in endless debates about optimal ways to serve mobile websites so they got listed at the top for mobile searches.

I won?t get into the details of Google?s recommendations for making mobile-compatible variations of a web page, but briefly, they are:

  • Make them responsive (serve the same page with an altered design using techniques like CSS 3 Media Queries)
  • Have a separate sub-domain served for user-agents (like http://m.google.com/, http://m.yelp.com/ etc.)
  • Provide different HTML output based on the type of user-agent (desktop or mobile)

Responsive design is the best way forward in the present web demography. There are a lot of benefits, although some experts will tell you that one of the finest ways to leverage mobile SEO is to have a separate domain served based on the user-agent.

Such a method ? when you redirect the user to a mobile version of the website based on the user-agent ? involves some complicated steps like adding switchboard tags (similar to canonical) and/or using robots.txt to make sure Googlebot Mobile gets to the right version of your website.

A responsive design, on the other hand, discards all such complexity and makes things simple.

Why a Responsive Web is Better

If you?re in the loop of web designers and developers, you probably know that ?responsive web design? is the hottest trend right now. Large brands have shifted their focus to designing websites that look good on mobile devices like smartphones and tablets while also looking sharp on a desktop ? all with the same content.

The advent of what is popularly called CSS3 Media Queries enables websites to have the same content (and HTML) now, but still render differently between smartphones, tablets, and desktop browsers.

Why this method is better:

  1. Easier to Develop:

Using CSS3 media queries reduces the time it takes to develop and customize websites to meet mobile standards and dimensions. Instead of having to create an entire website from scratch (for the mobile platform), the existing content is merely styled to fit mobile browsers of various sizes.

  1. Simpler Management of Content:

With a responsive design, you have only one set of content to manage instead of multiple pages on multiple domains. This makes it simpler to manage content on your website.

  1. Link Juice & Page Authority Preserved:

One of the greatest benefits from an SEO point of view is that since there?s just one page for desktop and mobile, the page retains its original link authority. There are ways in which a separate domain for mobile can be ?related? (something like canonical and alternate methods) and thus retain the authority and link-backs, but this is the simplest of them all.

  1. Google?s Recommendation:

And finally but most importantly, Google has written about having responsively designed websites more than the other options. It favors responsive design for reasons that are more design/code oriented, and those are worth looking at.

How to Tweak A Responsive Website To Meet Mobile SEO

1. Think Local

Recent surveys indicate that search volume for restaurants on mobiles is closing in on that for desktop searches. When people are home, they are more likely to look for things from their desktop. But on the move, it?s the smartphone or the tablet that serves their needs. And when it comes to that, you have to think ?local.?

Most mobile search results are largely influenced by geo-specific parameters.?This means you have to tweak your website to meet local SEO pointers. This enables Google to identify your optimized website as a suitable result for display in local searches ? mobile being one of the most important ones.

2. Think Shorter Keywords

When it comes to mobile phones and tablets, people are using touch-screen keys. They?re not comfortable typing out the entire search phrase, so the keywords they?re using are shorter than normal. Target shorter keywords if you want to show up on mobile searches more often.

Another interesting user experience with regard to mobile searches is that people are more prone to tap the keyword suggestions that Google offers when they start searching for specific terms. Take note of Google?s recommendations and target your keywords based on them. You can get Google?s recommended keywords either while you begin searching for keyword phrases, or on Google?s AdWords Keyword Tool.

3. Think Mobile Analytics

Google?s Mobile section in Web Analytics offers insights into the number of visits from mobile devices like smartphones and tablets. As a webmaster/SEO, you can tweak the results to include more metrics like keywords and thereby track which keywords are driving traffic. Even a cursory look reveals a lot and can give you ideas for small tweaks that will energize your mobile SEO efforts.

4. Think Users First

The best advice you?ll ever hear from the likes of UI/UX experts, however, is this: focus your mobile strategy to help users find information on your website quickly and easily. Forcing users to resort to pinch-to-zoom should be avoided, and having a lot of heavy-load graphics on a mobile website is not recommended either.

Mobile phone users do have 3G (and 4G) connectivity these days, but resources on mobile devices aren?t as powerful as those on desktops and laptops. At least not yet. Users still prefer fast-loading websites that present information well within the smaller dimensions of their smartphones and tablets.

The Way Forward

It has always been a matter of faith that a well-designed, information-rich website will attract both visitors and links. Responsive web design is the next big thing not because it?s a spectacular method of having the same HTML code while varying the design, but because it makes it easy for the user, browser cache, user-agents, and crawlers to track the website. Since the information is the same, it makes sense to have just one page for both desktop and mobile versions.

Local SEO, intuitive and smart keyword targeting, mobile analytics tracking, and a commitment to good usability are the essential elements of effective mobile SEO.

Source: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/top-50-seo-myths-everyone-should-know-about/58245/

twas the night before christmas santa Capital STEEZ George Bush After Christmas Sales 2012 Charles Durning Webster Ny

Stem cell discovery gives insight into motor neuron disease

Feb. 11, 2013 ? A discovery using stem cells from a patient with motor neuron disease could help research into treatments for the condition. The study used a patient's skin cells to create motor neurons -- nerve cells that control muscle activity -- and the cells that support them called astrocytes.

Researchers studied these two types of cells in the laboratory. They found that a protein expressed by abnormalities in a gene linked to motor neuron disease, which is called TDP-43, caused the astrocytes to die.

The study, led by the University of Edinburgh and funded by the Motor Neurone Disease Association, provides fresh insight into the mechanisms involved in the disease.

Although TDP-43 mutations are a rare cause of motor neuron disease (MND), scientists are especially interested in the gene because in the vast majority of MND patients, TDP-43 protein (made by the TDP-43 gene) forms pathological clumps inside motor neurons.

Motor neurons die in MND leading to paralysis and early death.

This study shows for the first time that abnormal TDP-43 protein causes death of astrocytes. The researchers, however, found that the damaged astrocytes were not directly toxic to motor neurons.

Better understanding the role of astrocytes could help to inform research into treatments for MND.

Professor Siddharthan Chandran, of the University of Edinburgh, said: "Motor neuron disease is a devastating and ultimately fatal condition, for which there is no cure or effective treatment. It is not just a question of looking solely at motor neurons, but also the cells that surround them, to understand why motor neurons die. Our aim is to find ways to slow down progression of this devastating disease and ultimately develop a cure."

These findings, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences., are significant as they show that different mechanisms are at work in different types of MND.

The research, led by the University of Edinburgh's Euan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Research, was carried out in collaboration with King's College, London, Columbia University in New York, the University of California and the Gladstone Institutes in San Francisco.

Dr Brian Dickie, the MND Association's Director of Research Development, said: "From a therapeutic perspective this finding is important because it means that specific treatments targeted at astrocytes may only be relevant and effective, in specific subsets of patients who will have to be carefully selected for drug trials."

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of Edinburgh.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/most_popular/~3/brOMFda4Du4/130211162331.htm

geraldo rivera supreme court health care joe oliver joba chamberlain new york mega millions jetblue jetblue

Googling Your Genealogy webinar | FamilyTreeUniversity.com

GooglingYourGenealogy_200x200There are many flavors of Google, from Search Engine to Social Media Network, from Email Inbox to Online Library. In this hour-long webinar, Lisa Louise Cooke?who literally wrote the book on google for genealogy with The Genealogist?s Guide to Google?will lay out essential tools for your family research, both basics and the lesser known. So take a deep breath and wander onto the web, where you?ll soon be finding fascinating facts about your ancestors faster than ever before. Sign up now to receive a free coy of Family Tree Magazine?s Step-by-Step Guide to Google.

Date: Thursday, Feb. 28
Starting Time: 7pm EST/6pm CST/5pm MST/4pm PST
Presenter: Lisa Louise Cooke
Duration: 1 hour
Price: $49.99 ($39.99 early bird until 2/21)

What You?ll Learn:

  • Tips and tricks to excel at Basic and Advanced Google Search
  • How to set up and use Google Alerts to receive notifications about your ancestors
  • Explore old scholarly papers on your family history with Google Scholar
  • Dive into the annals of past design and inventions with Google Patent
  • Learn to scan and upload pages of books in other languages and find out what they say with Google Translate

Register

Source: http://www.familytreeuniversity.com/googling-your-genealogy-webinar

memorial day ivan rodriguez planetary resources mothers day gift ideas natalee holloway scotty mccreery megan fox pregnant

Study Confirms Tea Party Was Created by Big Tobacco and Billionaires (Little green footballs)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/284154874?client_source=feed&format=rss

Hurricane Isaac 2012 bill nye Snooki Baby terrell owens terrell owens neil armstrong little league world series

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Jude Law, Channing Tatum share Super Bowl plans

Jude Law, from left, Rooney Mara, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Vinessa Shaw and Channing Tatum attend the premiere of "Side Effects" hosted by the Cinema Society and Open Road Films on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)

Jude Law, from left, Rooney Mara, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Vinessa Shaw and Channing Tatum attend the premiere of "Side Effects" hosted by the Cinema Society and Open Road Films on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)

Channing Tatum attends the premiere of "Side Effects" hosted by the Cinema Society and Open Road Films on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)

Jude Law attends the premiere of "Side Effects" hosted by the Cinema Society and Open Road Films on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)

Rooney Mara attends the premiere of "Side Effects" hosted by the Cinema Society and Open Road Films on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)

Catherine Zeta-Jones attends the premiere of "Side Effects" hosted by the Cinema Society and Open Road Films on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013 in New York. (Photo by Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)

(AP) ? British actor Jude Law says he'll be taking part in a time-honored American tradition this weekend: Super Bowl Sunday.

"I follow most sports, so of course I'm aware of it and I'll probably watch it, but I live in London and so I don't follow it that closely. It's more than just a game here, though, right? It's like have a party. Have a dip. Drink some beer," said Law.

When asked if he'll be participating in any tailgate parties when the Baltimore Ravens face off against the San Francisco 49ers, Law admitted he had no clue what "tailgating" meant.

"Really? OK. I believe you. I don't know what you're talking about. I'm not even gonna say," he said, laughing.

Luckily his "Side Effects" co-star, Channing Tatum, said he'd teach Law about Americans football traditions. He said he was heading to his New Orleans bar, Saints and Sinners for the weekend and was hoping for a good game.

"I really kind of want Baltimore to pull it out for Ray (Lewis) because it's a sweet story but I really like San Francisco's quarterback and whatnot so I think it's gonna be a really good game," said Tatum.

The actors joined their castmates, including Catherine Zeta-Jones and Rooney Mara, at the New York premiere of their psychological thriller "Side Effects" on Thursday. The film opens in U.S. theaters next Friday.

Turns out Law and Tatum have more in common than Steven Soderbergh's latest film: They've both been named People's Sexiest Man Alive.

"Yeah, there's a complete handshake and like a password and whatnot. I can't tell you any of those. I know what your next question is. It's not gonna happen. They come and kill you ? all of them. All of them together come and actually murder you. Yeah, everybody. They come and take you in the night and you disappear if you explain any of those secrets," joked Tatum, the current title holder.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-02-01-People-Jude%20Law/id-4250203fe18d433fba8fdc9c3419d41f

tornadoes mitch hedberg secret service scandal shea weber greystone sidney crosby at the drive in

Hezbollah condemns Israel's raid on Syria

BEIRUT (AP) -- Syria threatened Thursday to retaliate for an Israeli airstrike and its ally Iran said there will be repercussions for the Jewish state over the attack.

U.S. officials said Israel launched a rare airstrike inside Syria on Wednesday. The target was a convoy believed to be carrying anti-aircraft weapons bound for Hezbollah, the powerful Lebanese militant group allied with Syria and Iran.

Syrian Ambassador to Lebanon Ali Abdul-Karim Ali said Damascus "has the option and the capacity to surprise in retaliation."

In Iran, the semi-official Fars news agency quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian as saying the raid on Syria will have significant implications for Israel.

Hezbollah condemned the attack as "barbaric aggression" and Syrian ally Russia said it appeared to be an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation.

In Israel, a lawmaker close to hard-line Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stopped short of confirming involvement in the strike. But he hinted that Israel could carry out similar missions in the future.

The Syrian ambassador said he could not predict when Damascus would retaliate. He told Hezbollah's al-Ahd news website that it was up to the relevant authorities to prepare the retaliation and choose the time and place.

Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi condemned the airstrike on state television, calling it a clear violation of Syria's sovereignty. Iran is Syria's strongest ally in the Middle East, and has provided President Bashar Assad's government with military and political backing for years.

Russia, Syria's strongest international ally, said Moscow is taking "urgent measures to clarify the situation in all its details."

"If this information is confirmed, we have a case of unprovoked attacks on targets in the territory of a sovereign state, which grossly violates the U.N. Charter and is unacceptable," Russia's Foreign Ministry said in a statement. "Whatever the motives, this is not justified."

Hezbollah, closely allied with Syria and Iran, said it "expresses full solidarity with Syria's command, army and people."

Hezbollah did not mention any convoy in the statement but said the strike aimed to prevent Arab and Muslim forces from developing their military capabilities.

The Syrian military denied the existence of any weapons shipment and said a scientific research facility outside Damascus was hit by the Israeli warplanes. It said the target was in the area of Jamraya, northwest of Damascus and about 15 kilometers (10 miles) from the Lebanese border.

Maj. Gen. Abdul-Aziz Jassem al-Shallal, who became in December one of the most senior Syrian army officers to defect, told The Associated Press by telephone from Turkey that the targeted site is a "major and well-known" center to develop weapons known as the Scientific Research Center.

Al-Shallal, who until his defection was the commander of the Military Police, said no chemical or nonconventional weapons are at the site. He added that foreign experts, including Russians and Iranians, are usually at such centers.

Regional security officials said Wednesday that the targeted shipment included sophisticated Russian-made SA-17 anti-aircraft missiles, which if acquired by Hezbollah would enable the militants to shoot down Israeli jets, helicopters and surveillance drones. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief the media.

Israeli lawmaker Tzachi Hanegbi, who is close to the prime minister, said pinpoint strikes are not enough to counter the threat of Hezbollah obtaining sophisticated weaponry from Syria.

"Israel's preference would be if a Western entity would control these weapons systems," Hanegbi said. "But because it appears the world is not prepared to do what was done in Libya or other places, then Israel finds itself like it has many times in the past facing a dilemma that only it knows how to respond to," he added.

He was referring to NATO's 2011 military intervention in Libya that helped oust dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

"Even if there are reports about pinpoint operations, these are not significant solutions to the threat itself because we are talking about very substantial capabilities that could reach Hezbollah," he added.

Syria's civil war has sapped Assad's power and threatens to deprive Hezbollah of a key supporter, in addition to its land corridor to Iran. The two countries provide Hezbollah with the bulk of its funding and arms.

Earlier this week, Netanyahu warned of the dangers of Syria's "deadly weapons," saying the country is "increasingly coming apart."

The same day, Israel moved a battery of its new "Iron Dome" rocket defense system to the northern city of Haifa, which was battered by Hezbollah rocket fire in the 2006 war. The Israeli army called that move "routine."

The Israeli army won't say whether Iron Dome was sent north in connection to this operation. It does note that it has deployed the system in the north before.

Syria and its allies, including Hezbollah, deny there is an uprising against the government and say what is happening is part of a conspiracy against Damascus because of its support for anti-Israeli groups.

Hezbollah said the attack is part of that conspiracy "that aims to destroy Syria, its army and vital role in the line of resistance" against Israel.

----

Associated Press writer Ian Deitch contributed to this report from Jerusalem.

Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ML_SYRIA_ISRAEL?SITE=CAACS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

pilar sanders andrew young real life barbie zipper armenian genocide asteroid mining memorial day

Friday, February 1, 2013

New York State: Gun bill knocks GOP support for New York's Cuomo; most republicans say gun bill went too far

January 30, 2013 - Gun Bill Knocks GOP Support For New York's Cuomo, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Most Republicans Say Gun Bill Went Too Far
Word format

Republican disapproval of New York's tough new gun-control law could be taking a toll on Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whose all-time high 74 - 13 percent job approval rating last month drops to a still-solid 59 - 28 percent in a Quinnipiac University poll released today.

Voters in non-gun homes approve of the governor 68 - 19 percent. Voters in households with a gun disapprove 50 - 40 percent. Republican approval of the governor, 68 - 18 percent in a survey by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University on December 12, just two days before the Newtown massacre, is a split 44 - 43 percent today. Democratic support, 82 - 9 percent in December, is 74 - 14 percent today. Approval by independent voters drops from 70 - 12 percent to 54 - 32 percent. Women approve of Gov. Cuomo 64 - 23 percent, down from 73 - 12 percent. Men approve 54 - 33 percent, down from 74 - 14 percent. The gun-control package signed by Gov. Cuomo this month goes "too far' in restricting gun owners' rights, 34 percent of all voters, including 59 percent of Republicans, say. The gun- control measure does not go far enough in protecting public safety, 30 percent of all voters, including 17 percent of Republicans, say. The measure is "about right," 30 percent of all voters, including 20 percent of Republicans, say. "With approval ratings that consistently topped 70 percent, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo had the political capital to spend when he set out to pass the toughest gun control laws in the nation," said Maurice Carroll, director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. "It is possible that the gun law cost him some of that political capital, but a 2-1 job approval rating still makes him the envy of most governors." "Is Gov. Cuomo's honeymoon with Republicans over, or is this just a spat that can be patched up in the months ahead?' Carroll asked. "Cuomo lost some Republican support after the 2011 same-sex marriage bill, but he got it back." By a 4-1 margin, New York State voters support the new requirement that mental health professionals report patients whom they believe are a threat to themselves or others so police can confiscate any weapons the patient owns:
  • 76 percent support the measure;
  • 19 percent are opposed.
Support is higher among Democrats, 83 - 12 percent, than among Republicans, 71 - 24 percent. Independent voter support the mental health measure 71 - 23 percent. Support among voters in gun households is 72 - 23 percent. Voters reject 56 - 32 percent the argument that fewer mentally ill people will seek help because of this measure. "Perhaps the most controversial measure in New York State's new package of gun laws, the mental health provision wins strong support and seems to put Democrats and Republicans in an interesting role reversal on law and order vs. civil rights," Carroll said. Stricter gun laws will do more to reduce gun violence in schools than armed guards, New York State voters say 48 - 40 percent. By a 46 - 22 percent margin, voters have an unfavorable opinion of the leadership of the National Rifle Assn. Job approval ratings are down slightly for other leaders:
  • Voters approve 57 - 39 percent of the job President Barack Obama is doing, down from 62 - 35 percent December 12;
  • Sen. Charles Schumer gets a 60 - 30 percent job score, down from 63 - 23 percent;
  • Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has a 57 - 21 percent score, down from 61 - 18 percent, her highest ever.
From January 23 - 28, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,127 New York State voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.9 percentage points. Live interviewers call land lines and cell phones. The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio, Virginia and the nation as a public service and for research. For more information or RSS feed, visit http://www.quinnipiac.edu/polling.xml, or call (203) 582-5201, or follow us on Twitter. 1. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Andrew Cuomo is handling his job as Governor?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Approve              59%    44%    74%    54%    54%    64%    59%    63%
 Disapprove           28     43     14     32     33     23     29     19
 DK/NA                13     13     12     14     12     13     12     18
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Approve              70%    53%    56%    60%    65%    54%    59%    63%
 Disapprove           21     32     28     29     27     30     30     24
 DK/NA                 9     15     17     11      7     17     10     13
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Approve              51%    66%    64%    65%    62%    45%    40%    68%    56%
 Disapprove           37     21     23     20     27     44     50     19     31
 DK/NA                12     13     14     15     11     10     10     13     13
  
 
TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Andrew Cuomo is handling his job as Governor?

                                                              APPROVE.......
                                                              High    Low
                      Jan 30  Dec 12  Sep 12  Jul 25  May 30  Dec 12  Feb 23
                      2013    2012    2012    2012    2012    2012    2011
  
 Approve              59      74      70      73      71      74      56
 Disapprove           28      13      16      16      16      13      15
 DK/NA                13      13      14      12      13      13      29
  
  
 
2. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Charles Schumer is handling his job as United States Senator?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Approve              60%    39%    79%    53%    53%    66%    58%    71%
 Disapprove           30     53     12     35     37     24     33     12
 DK/NA                10      8      9     12     10     10      9     16
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Approve              69%    54%    53%    65%    67%    60%    58%    63%
 Disapprove           25     33     32     29     27     26     31     29
 DK/NA                 6     12     15      6      6     14     11      8
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Approve              53%    65%    63%    65%    60%    52%    46%    66%    59%
 Disapprove           35     26     28     25     32     38     45     24     30
 DK/NA                12      9      9     11      9     10      9     10     11
  
 
TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Charles Schumer is handling his job as United States Senator? (*High also 69% Oct 2001)

                                                              APPROVE.......
                                                              High    Low
                      Jan 30  Dec 12  Sep 12  Jul 25  May 30  Dec 08  Apr 15
                      2013    2012    2012    2012    2012    2004*   1999
  
 Approve              60      63      62      61      64      69      51
 Disapprove           30      23      25      25      26      16      22
 DK/NA                10      15      13      14      10      15      28
  
  
 
3. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Kirsten Gillibrand is handling her job as United States Senator?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Approve              57%    41%    73%    52%    53%    61%    56%    72%
 Disapprove           21     38      6     27     26     16     25      5
 DK/NA                22     21     22     21     20     23     19     23
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Approve              63%    54%    55%    59%    63%    53%    60%    59%
 Disapprove           21     21     16     23     25     17     24     20
 DK/NA                16     25     29     19     12     30     15     21
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Approve              50%    63%    61%    63%    56%    49%    50%    62%    52%
 Disapprove           27     15     21     15     24     29     28     17     23
 DK/NA                23     22     18     22     20     23     23     21     25
  
 
TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Kirsten Gillibrand is handling her job as United States Senator?

                                                              APPROVE.......
                                                              High    Low
                      Jan 30  Dec 12  Jul 25  May 30  Apr 05  Dec 12  Feb 17
                      2013    2012    2012    2012    2012    2012    2009
  
 Approve              57      61      54      60      60      61      28
 Disapprove           21      18      20      22      21      18      10
 DK/NA                22      21      26      18      19      21      62
  
  
 
4. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as President?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Approve              57%    17%    90%    43%    49%    64%    48%    89%
 Disapprove           39     82      8     48     47     32     48      6
 DK/NA                 4      1      2      9      4      4      3      6
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Approve              66%    52%    57%    59%    56%    60%    58%    56%
 Disapprove           33     43     38     38     43     34     40     40
 DK/NA                 2      5      6      4      2      6      2      4
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Approve              46%    71%    53%    71%    53%    39%    33%    67%    58%
 Disapprove           50     25     42     23     44     60     64     29     40
 DK/NA                 4      4      4      6      3      1      3      4      2
  
 
TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as President?

                                                              APPROVE.......
                                                              High    Low
                      Jan 30  Dec 12  Jul 25  May 31  Apr 05  Feb 19  Aug 12
                      2013    2012    2012    2012    2012    2009    2011
  
 Approve              57      62      57      58      56      72      45
 Disapprove           39      35      38      39      38      17      49
 DK/NA                 4       3       5       3       6      10       6
  
  
 
5. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the state legislature is handling its job?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Approve              32%    24%    41%    28%    31%    33%    29%    44%
 Disapprove           50     64     37     56     55     46     55     33
 DK/NA                18     12     22     16     14     21     16     23
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Approve              37%    30%    34%    31%    33%    41%    29%    32%
 Disapprove           49     51     44     52     57     36     58     49
 DK/NA                14     20     22     16     10     23     13     19
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Approve              27%    37%    35%    36%    33%    25%    23%    37%    27%
 Disapprove           60     43     43     43     51     64     65     43     61
 DK/NA                13     21     21     21     16     11     12     20     12
  
 
TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way the state legislature is handling its job?

                                                              APPROVE.......
                                                              High    Low
                      Jan 30  Dec 12  Sep 12  Jul 26  Feb 15  Dec 12  Sep 01
                      2013    2012    2012    2012    2012    2012    2010
  
 Approve              32      35      34      31      29      35      15
 Disapprove           50      46      50      51      58      46      75
 DK/NA                18      18      15      18      13      18       9
  
  
 
11. Based on what you've heard or read about the changes to gun laws that Governor Cuomo and lawmakers agreed on, do you think these changes go too far in terms of restricting the rights of gun owners, or not far enough in terms of protecting public safety, or are the changes about right?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Too far              34%    59%    12%    44%    44%    24%    40%    16%
 Not far enough       30     17     41     24     25     34     26     44
 About right          30     20     40     26     26     34     29     39
 DK/NA                 6      5      7      6      5      7      5      2
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Too far              21%    42%    37%    37%    26%    38%    35%    30%
 Not far enough       35     27     29     25     36     24     33     31
 About right          40     25     26     34     34     29     27     34
 DK/NA                 4      7      8      4      4      9      5      5
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Too far              51%    19%    28%    19%    35%    58%    61%    23%    35%
 Not far enough       17     43     32     39     29     17     12     37     31
 About right          27     31     35     34     32     21     23     34     27
 DK/NA                 5      7      5      8      4      4      4      6      7
  
  
 
12. As you may know, one of the state's new gun laws requires mental-health professionals to report patients who they believe to be a threat to themselves or to others. Law enforcement could then confiscate any firearm owned by the patient. Supporters say this law is necessary to protect public safety. Opponents say this law violates the civil rights of the mentally ill. Do you support or oppose this new law?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Support              76%    71%    83%    71%    70%    81%    77%    84%
 Oppose               19     24     12     23     24     14     17     16
 DK/NA                 6      6      5      6      6      5      6      -
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Support              79%    74%    71%    81%    83%    71%    79%    76%
 Oppose               16     20     21     17     13     21     18     18
 DK/NA                 5      6      8      2      4      8      4      5
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Support              74%    75%    80%    75%    80%    68%    72%    79%    79%
 Oppose               21     19     15     19     15     27     23     15     15
 DK/NA                 5      6      5      7      5      6      5      5      6
  
  
 
13. Do you think because of this measure fewer mentally ill people will seek help?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Yes, fewer will
  seek help           32%    34%    31%    33%    35%    30%    30%    34%
 No                   56     56     58     57     56     57     59     56
 DK/NA                11     10     11     10      9     14     11     10
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Yes, fewer will
  seek help           24%    38%    35%    32%    27%    39%    33%    29%
 No                   68     50     54     57     65     51     60     56
 DK/NA                 8     13     11     11      7     10      7     15
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Yes, fewer will
  seek help           36%    29%    31%    30%    31%    41%    41%    30%    34%
 No                   52     60     59     61     57     47     51     59     60
 DK/NA                12     11      9     10     12     12      8     12      6
  
  
 
14. Which of these do you think would do more to reduce gun violence in schools, having stricter gun laws or armed guards in schools?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Stricter gun laws    48%    24%    72%    36%    39%    57%    43%    65%
 Armed guards         40     61     20     49     48     33     44     29
 DK/NA                12     14      8     15     13     10     12      6
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Stricter gun laws    61%    41%    44%    46%    59%    40%    49%    52%
 Armed guards         29     47     43     42     35     50     40     35
 DK/NA                10     12     13     12      7     10     11     12
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Stricter gun laws    34%    62%    50%    59%    49%    27%    24%    58%    42%
 Armed guards         51     28     39     30     41     60     60     31     47
 DK/NA                15      9     10     11     10     13     15     10     11
  
  
 
15. Is your opinion of the leadership of the National Rifle Association favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?

                      Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk
  
 Favorable            22%    42%     5%    27%    30%    14%    26%     8%
 Unfavorable          46     23     61     44     43     49     49     43
 Hvn't hrd enough     30     33     32     27     25     35     24     48
 REFUSED               2      2      1      2      2      2      2      1
  
                      COLLEGE DEG   ANNUAL HSHOLD INC    AGE IN YRS.......
                      Yes    No     100K  18-34  35-54  55+
  
 Favorable            17%    25%    23%    22%    22%    18%    24%    22%
 Unfavorable          67     34     35     49     58     33     47     51
 Hvn't hrd enough     16     39     40     28     20     48     27     25
 REFUSED               1      2      2      1      -      -      2      2
  
                      AREA.............    DENSITY............  GUN HSHOLD  HvKds
                      UpStat NYC    Sub    Urban  Suburb Rural  Yes    No   PbSch
  
 Favorable            29%    14%    22%    15%    24%    33%    45%    12%    24%
 Unfavorable          37     51     54     50     52     27     26     54     35
 Hvn't hrd enough     31     34     23     33     24     37     27     32     39
 REFUSED               3      1      1      2      1      3      2      1      1
  
 

Demographic Summary

Source: http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/new-york-state/release-detail/?ReleaseID=1838

ny lottery Ohio Lottery Colorado Lottery Pa Lottery Ebates lotto Illinois Lottery